In my last article, I shared what I’ve been learning from working with district leadership teams across the country as they navigate questions about artificial intelligence, digital wellness, and purposeful technology use. That work has provided me with insightful information and meaningful opportunities to learn from educators, students, and families.
Throughout these conversations, one message continues to stand out:
We cannot begin, and we cannot stay focused only on the tools and the tech.
We must move forward.
The Shift Schools Must Make Now
In Part II, I emphasized that educator readiness is the foundation of successful AI implementation. Schools that prioritize supporting educators are the ones seeing the most progress. And it starts with leadership and consistency. But readiness alone is not enough.
What I have learned from working with school Task Forces across the country is that they have had many conversations around AI, screen time, and tech use. They have explored the possibilities and understand the urgency with these topics, but they also have a similar question.
What do we do now? And this is where I believe that leadership matters most.
Moving From Conversations to Systems
Across the districts I continue to work with, I see a clear difference between schools that are talking about AI and schools that are leading with AI. I also see a difference between AI in education and AI Education. I recently met with a State Representative in Pennsylvania, and we had this conversation as well. The difference I’ve noticed and that we discussed is not just access to tools. It is about the presence of a system. Schools making meaningful progress are not relying on isolated efforts when they find time. Instead, they are building structures with a lens on consistency, clarity, and sustainability.
The system they are developing is focused on having:
clear expectations for the responsible use of all technology
consistent messaging across classrooms and grade levels
ongoing professional learning opportunities with follow-up support
shared language for students, staff, and families
opportunities for student voice and feedback
When these are part of the conversation, AI implementation becomes less about individual decisions, which leads to inconsistency, and becomes more about a goal for collaborative and collective progress.
Consistency Builds Confidence
One of the most common challenges I have been hearing from both educators and students is inconsistency. I’ve met with student groups, interviewed educators, spoken with parents, and heard similar comments from educators and parents across the country.
In one classroom, the use of technology, and specifically AI, is encouraged. In another, it is restricted. In one classroom or school, the expectations are clear and known to all. In another, they are undefined or inconsistent.
Continue reading on LinkedIn and subscribe to my newsletter there as well.
If your school, district, or organization is beginning conversations or looking to dive in and learn more about AI policy, professional learning, or responsible implementation, I’d welcome the opportunity to support your next steps through leadership workshops, keynote sessions, or strategic planning partnerships.
Preparing people is what makes AI implementation successful.
Contact me to work with you or speak at your event.bit.ly/thriveineduPDSee testimonials about my work via my website.
About Rachelle
Dr. Rachelle Dené Poth is a Spanish and STEAM: What’s Next in Emerging Technology Teacher. Rachelle is also an attorney with a Juris Doctor degree from Duquesne University School of Law and a Master’s in Instructional Technology. Rachelle received her Doctorate in Instructional Technology, with a research focus on AI and Professional Development. In addition to teaching, she is a full-time consultant and works with companies and organizations to provide PD, speaking, and consulting services. Contact Rachelle for your event!
Rachelle is an ISTE-certified educator and community leader who served as president of the ISTE Teacher Education Network. By EdTech Digest, she was named the EdTech Trendsetter of 2024, one of 30 K-12 IT Influencers to follow in 2021, and one of 150 Women Global EdTech Thought Leaders in 2022.
She is the author of ten books, including ‘What The Tech? An Educator’s Guide to AI, AR/VR, the Metaverse and More” and ‘How To Teach AI’. In addition, other books include, “In Other Words: Quotes That Push Our Thinking,” “Unconventional Ways to Thrive in EDU,” “The Future is Now: Looking Back to Move Ahead,” “Chart A New Course: A Guide to Teaching Essential Skills for Tomorrow’s World, “True Story: Lessons That One Kid Taught Us,” “Things I Wish […] Knew” and her newest “How To Teach AI” is available from ISTE or on Amazon.
In part IIof the series, I shared my thoughts about what I’ve been learning from working with district leadership teams across the country, and the work is focused on AI, digital wellness, and innovation. In part II, I shared my thoughts on preparing educators in these areas and why it means preparing school leaders first. This work has provided me with meaningful opportunities to learn with and work alongside educators, students, and families, and I am noticing common conversations and concerns in the schools.
Screen time
Students talk about it. Families ask about it. Teachers notice it. Administrators are expected to respond to it. What do we do about the devices?
But what I have learned from working with schools is that the most important leadership question is not simply how much time students spend on screens. The more important question is: What are students doing while they are on those screens?
As technology continues to evolve in our schools and in the world, we need to move beyond conversations that focus only on limits and restrictions. We need to focus on purpose, guidance, and readiness.
Moving From Screen Time to Purposeful Use
Conversations about student technology use have primarily focused on recommended amounts and on setting limits. The American Pediatric Association had recommendations for some of the most common questions: How many hours per day? How often should devices be used? When should students disconnect?
Although the conversation has shifted away from specific time limits, those guiding questions still matter. But today’s learning environments require something more intentional and thoughtful, and should bring in different perspectives about what the common uses are. We need to better understand how students are using technology and whether that use supports learning, connection, creativity, and growth. From my conversations, I have learned that students are using devices to:
Interact with friends and family
collaborate with classmates
create original work
communicate with teachers
design presentations
explore complex ideas
interact with artificial intelligence tools
Continue reading via my newsletter on LinkedIn and subscribe. Also, subscribe to my newsletter for events, resources, and more.
If Your Organization Is Beginning This Work
I help schools and other organizations (law firms, healthcare professionals, business owners) implement AI responsibly through policy guidance, professional learning, and classroom-ready strategies grounded in both instructional practice and legal insight.
My sessions focus on helping teams:
• understand what AI can and cannot do
• recognize responsible-use considerations
• build confidence using emerging tools
•align implementation with organizational priorities
If your school, district, or organization is beginning conversations or looking to dive in and learn more about AI policy, professional learning, or responsible implementation, I’d welcome the opportunity to support your next steps through leadership workshops, keynote sessions, or strategic planning partnerships.
Preparing people is what makes AI implementation successful.
About Rachelle
Dr. Rachelle Dené Poth is a Spanish and STEAM: What’s Next in Emerging Technology Teacher. Rachelle is also an attorney with a Juris Doctor degree from Duquesne University School of Law and a Master’s in Instructional Technology. Rachelle received her Doctorate in Instructional Technology, with a research focus on AI and Professional Development. In addition to teaching, she is a full-time consultant and works with companies and organizations to provide PD, speaking, and consulting services. Contact Rachelle for your event!
Rachelle is an ISTE-certified educator and community leader who served as president of the ISTE Teacher Education Network. By EdTech Digest, she was named the EdTech Trendsetter of 2024, one of 30 K-12 IT Influencers to follow in 2021, and one of 150 Women Global EdTech Thought Leaders in 2022.
She is the author of ten books, including ‘What The Tech? An Educator’s Guide to AI, AR/VR, the Metaverse and More” and ‘How To Teach AI’. In addition, other books include, “In Other Words: Quotes That Push Our Thinking,” “Unconventional Ways to Thrive in EDU,” “The Future is Now: Looking Back to Move Ahead,” “Chart A New Course: A Guide to Teaching Essential Skills for Tomorrow’s World, “True Story: Lessons That One Kid Taught Us,” “Things I Wish […] Knew” and her newest “How To Teach AI” is available from ISTE or on Amazon.
Contact Rachelle to schedule sessions about Artificial Intelligence, AI and the Law, Coding, AR/VR, and more for your school or event! Submit the Contact Form.
Follow Rachelle on Bluesky, Instagram, and X at @Rdene915
During our ThriveinEDU livestream conversation about Kira, we explored a question that immediately resonated with educators:
What if planning, grading, and differentiation actually took half the time and still kept teachers in control of learning?
The question isn’t just about efficiency. It’s about sustainability and about supporting teachers to make instruction more responsive, more personalized, and more aligned to what students actually need in the moment, real-time responses, authentic feedback, and support from their teachers.
Kira recently released several new features (as part of their Kira 2.0 launch) that move beyond treating AI as a “lesson generator” or “assessment creator,” and it now works as a thought partner in the instructional workflow. After attending the Live Launch in New York on March 3rd and moderating the livestream, here are some of the biggest takeaways from the conversations that make the newest updates especially impactful for classrooms now.
Lesson/Course Studio
Many AI tools help teachers create one lesson at a time, which is highly beneficial and time-saving. But imagine you’re tasked with creating a course you’ve never taught or don’t have enough resources for. The amount of time needed is a bit overwhelming.
Kira’s Course and Lesson Studio helps educators generate both structured lessons and full, standards-aligned courses, including course outlines, unit sequences, lesson progressions, and assessments
Educators need to provide the topic, subject, grade level, and standards, and then, using this information or prompt, Kira builds the lesson with embedded formative checks already in place.
Formative assessment often happens after instruction, with Kira, teachers see student understanding during instruction.
As Rachel shared during the livestream:
“I don’t remember a time when I wasn’t taking work home or trying to get ahead of the game by planning out my week and then having to rewrite it midweek. It was so much work.”
Kira’s curriculum-building features help reduce that cycle in far less time. Rather than rewriting lessons to meet student needs, teachers start with a flexible structure they can adapt immediately, and, most importantly, stay in control. We are doing the editing, adjusting, and shaping of the lesson. This is an important distinction to make because it shows how crucial it is that teachers remain involved and review what has been generated.
Real-Time Insight Instead of End-of-Unit Surprises: Student Atlas
I have known about this for a few months and thought it was amazing. One of the most exciting updates in Kira 2.0 is Student Atlas, the platform’s student insight dashboard, now paired with Class Atlas, which brings those insights together at the class level.
Student Atlas provides:
concept-level mastery tracking
data confidence indicators
individual student support indicators
zones of proximal development insights
intervention suggestions
Rather than relying on a single quiz or test score, teachers can see which concepts students understand and where they’re struggling in real time. It enables us to see what concepts need reinforcing now, rather than waiting until the assessment is over and graded.
Class Atlas builds on this by turning individual insights into a clear, actionable class-wide view. Instead of opening 20+ student profiles and piecing things together, teachers can instantly answer: Where should I focus my instruction? and Which students need help with this skill? Teachers can even ask Kira to explain how it generated its recommendations, which helps schools as they look for tools and want to trust AI technologies.
Student Atlas also includes a data confidence indicator, helping educators assess the reliability of recommendations before making instructional decisions. That transparency supports professional judgment instead of replacing it.
Standards Alignment
Standards alignment is often one of the most time-consuming parts of planning, especially when building units or courses. And for educators teaching multiple courses, it is very time-consuming. But with Kira 2.0, that time requirement decreases because Kira 2.0 automatically tags lessons, activities, assessments, and questions to state standards, underlying skill progressions, and Bloom’s taxonomy levels.
Teachers can track how students are progressing through skills over time.
Supporting Multilingual Learners
Another standout feature we spoke about in the livestream is Kira’s built-in support for multilingual learners.
When gaps in understanding appear, Kira can generate:
scaffolded practice
targeted follow-up lessons
leveled reading supports
vocabulary scaffolds
translated instructional materials
Each of these supports is based on individual student performance, and not on a generic template that does not align with the student’s needs.
Differentiation is responsive rather than being reactive.
During the livestream, we talked about how, historically, differentiation required teachers to manually create multiple versions of lessons or assessments, which, of course, took a lot of time. With Kira, these supports are embedded directly inside the instructional workflow. Rachel said, “Especially talking about differentiation and the ease of it and being able to have the assistant nearby and go back and forth.”
Embedded support assists educators in providing what each student needs while giving them more time to work directly with each student.
Kira provides structure, but the teachers are the designers who provide the course’s vision.
Kira brings planning, assessment, differentiation, and student insight into one connected space. And when those pieces connect, teachers gain something incredibly valuable:
clarity flexibility time and better visibility into learning
About Rachelle
Dr. Rachelle Dené Poth is a Spanish and STEAM: What’s Next in Emerging Technology Teacher. Rachelle is also an attorney with a Juris Doctor degree from Duquesne University School of Law and a Master’s in Instructional Technology. Rachelle received her Doctorate in Instructional Technology, with a research focus on AI and Professional Development. In addition to teaching, she is a full-time consultant and works with companies and organizations to provide PD, speaking, and consulting services. Contact Rachelle for your event!
Rachelle is an ISTE-certified educator and community leader who served as president of the ISTE Teacher Education Network. By EdTech Digest, she was named the EdTech Trendsetter of 2024, one of 30 K-12 IT Influencers to follow in 2021, and one of 150 Women Global EdTech Thought Leaders in 2022.
She is the author of ten books, including ‘What The Tech? An Educator’s Guide to AI, AR/VR, the Metaverse and More” and ‘How To Teach AI’. In addition, other books include, “In Other Words: Quotes That Push Our Thinking,” “Unconventional Ways to Thrive in EDU,” “The Future is Now: Looking Back to Move Ahead,” “Chart A New Course: A Guide to Teaching Essential Skills for Tomorrow’s World, “True Story: Lessons That One Kid Taught Us,” “Things I Wish […] Knew” and her newest “How To Teach AI” is available from ISTE or on Amazon.
Contact Rachelle to schedule sessions about Artificial Intelligence, AI and the Law, Coding, AR/VR, and more for your school or event! Submit the Contact Form.
Follow Rachelle on Bluesky, Instagram, and X at @Rdene915
**Interested in writing a guest blog for my site? Would love to share your ideas! Submit your post here. Looking for a new book to read? Find these available at bit.ly/Pothbooks
************ Also, check out my THRIVEinEDU PodcastHere!
Join my show on THRIVEinEDU on Facebook. Join the group here.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming education. From lesson planning support to personalized learning pathways and administrative efficiencies, AI tools are a more common part of everyday classroom practices. At the same time, the speed at which this technology has advanced and been adopted into classrooms has led to understandable uncertainty among educators, leaders, and families who are asking important questions. These groups are concerned with the data that is being collected, who owns AI-generated work, and what responsibilities schools have when students and educators use these tools.
As both an attorney and educator who has spent more than eight years researching, teaching, presenting, and writing about AI, I have worked with schools across K–12 and higher education that are navigating these exact questions. The legal implications of AI are not barriers to innovation, but I consider them to serve as guardrails that assist schools with adopting technology responsibly. The key is protecting students, educators, and institutions and staying informed. Understanding the legal landscape and any potential legal implications as a result of the use of AI in classrooms helps schools move forward with confidence rather than hesitation.
Why AI and the Law Matter in Education
AI relies on data in order to function effectively. When it comes to schools, this means having access to student information, classroom artifacts, writing samples, images, and even data related to physical or behavioral information. Intent is not the deciding factor. Even if educators believe they are only sharing minimal information, that does not clearly identify a student, family member, or colleague, even seemingly harmless details can qualify as personally identifiable information (PII).
I’ve often spoken about some examples like referencing a favorite restaurant, a local landmark, a pet’s name, or an extracurricular activity, all of which could make a student identifiable when combined with other data points. Last year, an educator in one of my sessions said, “Enough stars to still form a constellation,” and that has stuck with me and I have shared it in each AI and the Law session I have done. That is why evaluating tools carefully and teaching students to do the same are essential. I often reference scavenger hunts, in that educators should not feel like they are on a scavenger hunt when trying to find out what happens to their information. We need transparency from vendors so that educators are aware and informed.
AI is also changing how decisions are made in schools. With many advances, there are recommendation systems, automated feedback tools, and predictive analytics that can influence learning pathways, grading practices, and student support services. Having an understanding of how these systems work and how they should be used responsibly is becoming part of educators’ and school leaders’ professional responsibilities.
Key Laws That Shape AI Use in Schools
There are several important laws that guide how schools must approach AI.
FERPA (Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act) protects the privacy of student education records. When schools use AI-powered platforms that process student work or store learning data, they must ensure that these tools comply with FERPA requirements and clearly define how student information is handled.
COPPA (Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act) applies to students under the age of 13 and requires parental consent before collecting personal information through online services. Because many AI tools rely on user-generated input, COPPA compliance becomes especially important in elementary and middle school settings.
GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation), although it is a European Union law, is relevant to U.S. schools that use tools developed by companies that operate internationally. There are many platforms created outside of the United States that educators may be unaware of, and so understanding GDPR is essential. Many platforms now include cookie permissions and data-use customization features in response to GDPR requirements. These protections often benefit schools globally.
Schools should also consider state-level student data privacy laws, which are increasingly changing the expectations for vendor contracts, third-party integrations, and data retention timelines. District leaders and IT teams play an essential role in ensuring these requirements are addressed before tools are introduced into classrooms.
Data Privacy and Vendor Responsibility
AI tools require large amounts of data to function effectively. That data may be used to improve the tool itself, train additional models, or support integrations across connected platforms. Even when a tool states that it does not share user data, connected services or embedded features may still interact with stored information. I was asked two years ago, when speaking at LACOE in California during my AI and the Law session, if someone should “trust the platform when it says they do not share or store the data.” My instant answer was “No.” And it was for this exact reason.
Before introducing any AI platform in schools, educators and school leaders should review terms of service, privacy policies, and compliance documentation. Look for references to FERPA, COPPA, and additional privacy protections. Look for the date that the privacy policy was most recently updated. Districts should also confirm whether vendors use student information to train future AI models and whether contracts clearly define ownership and storage expectations.
This is where collaboration with district technology teams becomes essential. Responsible adoption is not an individual teacher’s decision. It is a system-level responsibility supported by leadership, policy teams, and instructional staff working together. Collaboration is key.
Transparency Builds Trust With Students and Families
Responsible AI adoption depends on communication. Families deserve clear explanations of the tools being used, the data being collected, and how that data is protected.
When working with students under age 13, written parental consent may be required. Even when it is not legally necessary, providing families with opportunities to ask questions strengthens trust and partnership. Transparency also empowers students. When students understand how AI systems work and the risks they may pose, they become more thoughtful digital citizens and more informed users of technology.
Schools that proactively communicate expectations for AI use are more likely to build families’ confidence and reduce misunderstandings about how these tools support learning.
Accessibility, Equity, and Emerging Legal Considerations
As schools adopt AI tools, accessibility and equity must remain part of the conversation. Laws such as Section 504 ofthe Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) require that digital learning tools be accessible to all students. If AI-powered platforms create barriers rather than support access, schools may face compliance concerns. We need to consistently audit the tools we are using. It must be an ongoing process.
Schools must also consider how AI intersects with Title IX responsibilities, especially with the rise of deepfake technology, which leads to new risks related to harassment and impacts student safety. Policies must be in place for addressing the misuse of generative AI tools and clearly define expectations and response procedures.
Algorithmic bias and fairness are important parts of the conversation. Schools should evaluate whether AI systems produce equitable outcomes across student groups and whether automated recommendations influence learning opportunities in unintended ways. Responsible implementation includes ongoing evaluation, not just initial approval.
Teaching Digital Citizenship With AI Literacy
Legal compliance alone is not enough. Students must also develop the skills needed to evaluate AI responsibly.
Developing skills in these areas means recognizing risks such as deepfakes and misinformation, bias in generated content, and cyberbullying that is supported by emerging technologies. Schools that integrate digital citizenship with AI literacy will guide students to become thoughtful participants in technology-rich environments rather than passive users who lack true understanding and AI literacy skills.
Clear expectations around appropriate use and academic integrity help students develop ethical decision-making skills that extend beyond the classroom.
Supporting Schools and Organizations Through AI and Legal Guidance
As AI adoption accelerates, schools will benefit from having a structured support system in place that connects legal awareness with thoughtful and purposeful classroom practice. Through my work with educators in K–12 and higher education, I provide professional learning experiences that help schools understand privacy requirements, implement responsible AI strategies, and align classroom applications with policy expectations.
My work includes keynote presentations, workshops, district leadership sessions, curriculum planning support, and customized training focused on data privacy, academic integrity, digital citizenship, accessibility considerations, vendor evaluation, and responsible AI adoption. Each training is tailored to address specific needs, ranging from introductory awareness sessions to deeper implementation planning and leadership strategy development.
In addition to supporting schools and universities, I work with organizations across other sectors to explore how to implement AI responsibly while remaining aligned with legal expectations and organizational values. Many industries face the same challenges that educators do, surrounding uncertainty about data privacy, questions about intellectual property ownership, concerns about transparency in decision-making systems, and the need to develop policies that support ethical innovation. My work helps organizations evaluate tools thoughtfully, identify potential risks early, and create practical guardrails that support responsible adoption rather than reactive compliance.
Organizations in healthcare, legal services, workforce development, nonprofit leadership, and corporate training environments are increasingly recognizing the importance of AI literacy for employees at every level. Through workshops, leadership sessions, and strategy conversations, I help teams understand how AI systems work, the legal considerations that may be applicable to them, and how to build cultures of responsible use that prioritize trust, security, and human judgment.
Moving Forward With Confidence
Artificial intelligence is already shaping how students learn, communicate, and prepare for future careers. The goal is not simply to adopt AI tools, but to adopt them responsibly. And this is where our work as educators comes in and why we need to dive in and learn with and guide our students.
When educators understand the legal landscape of privacy, accessibility, intellectual property, and ethical use, they can make informed decisions that support innovation and student protection. With thoughtful planning, collaboration, and transparency, schools will create learning environments where AI enhances opportunities while maintaining trust, safety, and integrity across the entire school community.
I work with schools and organizations, both in person and virtually, to support thoughtful and responsible AI implementation through professional learning, curriculum design, and resource development specific to educators, students, and families, using a common language. I have also collaborated with leadership teams to develop AI guidance frameworks, classroom-ready activities, and policies that reflect legal considerations.
The resources created help districts communicate clearly and consistently with families about AI use, support educators in building AI literacy, and provide students with age-appropriate strategies for using AI safely, ethically, and responsibly. By combining legal insight with classroom experience, I help schools move beyond uncertainty toward sustainable systems that include clear expectations, transparency, and actionable guardrails for responsible use.
About Rachelle
Dr. Rachelle Dené Poth is a Spanish and STEAM: What’s Next in Emerging Technology Teacher. Rachelle is also an attorney with a Juris Doctor degree from Duquesne University School of Law and a Master’s in Instructional Technology. Rachelle received her Doctorate in Instructional Technology, with a research focus on AI and Professional Development. In addition to teaching, she is a full-time consultant and works with companies and organizations to provide PD, speaking, and consulting services. Contact Rachelle for your event!
Rachelle is an ISTE-certified educator and community leader who served as president of the ISTE Teacher Education Network. By EdTech Digest, she was named the EdTech Trendsetter of 2024, one of 30 K-12 IT Influencers to follow in 2021, and one of 150 Women Global EdTech Thought Leaders in 2022.
She is the author of ten books, including ‘What The Tech? An Educator’s Guide to AI, AR/VR, the Metaverse and More” and ‘How To Teach AI’. In addition, other books include, “In Other Words: Quotes That Push Our Thinking,” “Unconventional Ways to Thrive in EDU,” “The Future is Now: Looking Back to Move Ahead,” “Chart A New Course: A Guide to Teaching Essential Skills for Tomorrow’s World, “True Story: Lessons That One Kid Taught Us,” “Things I Wish […] Knew” and her newest “How To Teach AI” is available from ISTE or on Amazon.
Contact Rachelle to schedule sessions about Artificial Intelligence, AI and the Law, Coding, AR/VR, and more for your school or event! Submit the Contact Form.
Follow Rachelle on Bluesky, Instagram, and X at @Rdene915
**Interested in writing a guest blog for my site? Would love to share your ideas! Submit your post here. Looking for a new book to read? Find these available at bit.ly/Pothbooks
************ Also, check out my THRIVEinEDU PodcastHere!
Join my show on THRIVEinEDU on Facebook. Join the group here.
In collaboration with Learning Genie: All Opinions are my own
If there’s one thing I value in education, it’s authentic and honest conversations about what’s really happening in classrooms. The January and February Learning Latte meetups with Learning Genie were exactly that.
These meetups offered grounded, reflective discussions about teacher preparation, real classroom challenges, and how tools like Learning Genie can support, rather than replace, our professional judgment. And with a focus on UDL, Portrait of a Graduate, and Differentiation, Learning Genie offers everything in one solution!
Here are some takeaways:
January: Teacher Preparation, TPA Season & the “Idea Inventory”
January’s Learning Latte meetup focused on the importance of and value in truly listening to educators.
One of the most important parts of the conversation came from Robert Mayfield, who addressed a challenge that many of us have seen and experienced firsthand: pre-service teachers during the TPA season.
If you’ve worked with student teachers, you may notice the impact of getting started and how they feel about it. They can be:
Overwhelmed
Time-strapped
Focused on and worried about meeting rubric requirements
Relying heavily on pre-existing lesson plans
Trying to survive and balance all of the new tasks that come with our work.
Robert highlighted a key concern: When pre-service teachers rely too heavily on ready-made lessons, they may miss the opportunity to build their own instructional toolkit. That’s where the concept of an “idea inventory” comes in.
What Is an Idea Inventory?
An idea inventory is not just a folder of saved lessons over the course of the school year or years. It is a curated, reflective collection of strategies used, activity ideas, differentiation techniques, assessment approaches, and adaptable frameworks.
The inventory includes:
Multiple entry points for learners
Flexible scaffolding ideas
Variations for different readiness levels
Culturally responsive examples
Developmentally aligned strategies
All of this is especially critical in early childhood and elementary settings, where differentiation is foundational.
The January discussion reinforced what I have noticed when working with other educators. New teachers need to understand how to differentiate effectively and have the resources they need to support their work.
This is where Learning Genie can make an impact. It supports reflective planning and enables teachers to connect observations to instruction. It makes differentiation visible, which is essential.
A good question to consider is: “How do we help future teachers think like designers of learning?”
Learning Genie supports that mindset shift. When teachers reflect on student observations and use those insights to plan intentionally, it helps build professional capacity and confidence. And it builds community when educators and companies connect!
Enjoy learning from and sharing feedback with Dr. Gene Shi
February’s Learning Latte offered a clear view and many insights into a lived classroom experience.
February’s meetup included educators Sandy Ferguson and Gina Ogilvie. Sandy began by sharing classroom experiences, grounding the conversation in real practice rather than theory.
I always want to know the stories of other educators, the why behind the choices in activities, strategies, and tools used in their classrooms, and the impact.
Many conversations about edtech center around the features, dashboards, and integrations. But I’ve long said and heard it in their message. What matters is the impact it makes inside the classroom.
Highlights from Sandy and Gina
Authentic Application The conversation centered on how Learning Genie supports educators’ daily work. It helps with lesson planning, documentation, and communication, and it is easy to navigate and use.
Alignment with Developmental Needs In early childhood, especially, the tools we use must align with how children learn best.
Teacher Confidence When educators feel supported in leveraging technology to provide meaningful and personalized instruction, their confidence increases. Teacher confidence impacts classroom climate and positively boosts student engagement and interest in learning.
What stood out is that technology works best when it amplifies teacher expertise, not when it replaces it. Shifting from replacement to the enhancement and transformation potential of these tools is important. And when it enhances our students’ learning opportunities. Check out this video to learn more.
Connecting January and February: A Common Theme
Both sessions highlighted:
The importance of reflective practice
The need for intentional differentiation
The value of building professional capacity over time
The role of tools in supporting rather than shortcutting professional growth
January focused on building the foundation by helping new teachers develop their idea inventory. February provided a clear view of what this looks like in action, with experienced educators using tools to refine their professional practice and deepen students’ learning impact.
Final thoughts
The best educational tools don’t give us answers. I think that they help us ask better questions.
How are we differentiating?
What patterns are we noticing?
How are we building our “idea inventory?”
How are we supporting new teachers before they burn out?
Use these questions as a focus point, and I think you will find that a tool like Learning Genie is a catalyst for transformational and meaningful instruction and learning.
Enjoy sharing about Learning Genie in Pittsburgh and other conferences and school PD sessions!
About Rachelle
Dr. Rachelle Dené Poth is a Spanish and STEAM: What’s Next in Emerging Technology Teacher. Rachelle is also an attorney with a Juris Doctor degree from Duquesne University School of Law and a Master’s in Instructional Technology. Rachelle received her Doctorate in Instructional Technology, with a research focus on AI and Professional Development. In addition to teaching, she is a full-time consultant and works with companies and organizations to provide PD, speaking, and consulting services. Contact Rachelle for your event!
Rachelle is an ISTE-certified educator and community leader who served as president of the ISTE Teacher Education Network. By EdTech Digest, she was named the EdTech Trendsetter of 2024, one of 30 K-12 IT Influencers to follow in 2021, and one of 150 Women Global EdTech Thought Leaders in 2022.
She is the author of ten books, including ‘What The Tech? An Educator’s Guide to AI, AR/VR, the Metaverse and More” and ‘How To Teach AI’. In addition, other books include, “In Other Words: Quotes That Push Our Thinking,” “Unconventional Ways to Thrive in EDU,” “The Future is Now: Looking Back to Move Ahead,” “Chart A New Course: A Guide to Teaching Essential Skills for Tomorrow’s World, “True Story: Lessons That One Kid Taught Us,” “Things I Wish […] Knew” and her newest “How To Teach AI” is available from ISTE or on Amazon.
Contact Rachelle to schedule sessions about Artificial Intelligence, AI and the Law, Coding, AR/VR, and more for your school or event! Submit the Contact Form.
Follow Rachelle on Bluesky, Instagram, and X at @Rdene915
**Interested in writing a guest blog for my site? Would love to share your ideas! Submit your post here. Looking for a new book to read? Find these available at bit.ly/Pothbooks
************ Also, check out my THRIVEinEDU PodcastHere!
Join my show on THRIVEinEDU on Facebook. Join the group here.
Throughout the country, states and districts are taking different approaches to student cell phone use. Some have implemented complete bans, while others are leaving the decision to individual schools or educators.
What I’ve learned over the past 12 years of using devices in my classroom is that while policies can help create structure, they don’t build consistent digital habits. Digital wellness has to be taught, modeled, practiced, and reflected upon.
Why tech habits matter
With so much access to technology, we need to guide students in developing good digital habits. Digital wellness involves helping students understand when technology is helpful, when it becomes draining, and how to make intentional choices that will keep them balanced and present. Cell phone bans and updated device policies have been designed to promote digital wellness in our schools.
I’ve observed that in schools with cell phone bans, students are more interactive with one another, and their socialization skills are improving. For some students, knowing where their phone is and having it close by is important, and I can relate. But I also understand the importance of disconnecting and being present in the moment, especially in our classrooms, to be more focused on learning.
I have done a variety of activities with students and educators focused on digital habits. In one of them, I focus on the “benefits” and “drains” of devices. A simple way to start is with activities that help students map their “digital day.” Ask them to list all the ways they use their phone or other devices from morning to night. Next, have them decide when the use helps learning (taking a photo of notes, defining or translating a word, keeping time, conducting research, or even recording a podcast draft) or benefits their well-being (such as tracking steps, doing meditation, or using focus apps). They then identify when it is draining (doomscrolling or game-playing; checking notifications; causing reduced energy, lack of attention, or mood changes).
Continue reading the rest of my article on Edutopia.
About Rachelle
Dr. Rachelle Dené Poth is a Spanish and STEAM: What’s Next in Emerging Technology Teacher. Rachelle is also an attorney with a Juris Doctor degree from Duquesne University School of Law and a Master’s in Instructional Technology. Rachelle received her Doctorate in Instructional Technology, with a research focus on AI and Professional Development. In addition to teaching, she is a full-time consultant and works with companies and organizations to provide PD, speaking, and consulting services. Contact Rachelle for your event!
Rachelle is an ISTE-certified educator and community leader who served as president of the ISTE Teacher Education Network. By EdTech Digest, she was named the EdTech Trendsetter of 2024, one of 30 K-12 IT Influencers to follow in 2021, and one of 150 Women Global EdTech Thought Leaders in 2022.
She is the author of ten books, including ‘What The Tech? An Educator’s Guide to AI, AR/VR, the Metaverse and More” and ‘How To Teach AI’. In addition, other books include, “In Other Words: Quotes That Push Our Thinking,” “Unconventional Ways to Thrive in EDU,” “The Future is Now: Looking Back to Move Ahead,” “Chart A New Course: A Guide to Teaching Essential Skills for Tomorrow’s World, “True Story: Lessons That One Kid Taught Us,” “Things I Wish […] Knew” and her newest “How To Teach AI” is available from ISTE or on Amazon.
Contact Rachelle to schedule sessions about Artificial Intelligence, AI and the Law, Coding, AR/VR, and more for your school or event! Submit the Contact Form.
Follow Rachelle on Bluesky, Instagram, and X at @Rdene915
**Interested in writing a guest blog for my site? Would love to share your ideas! Submit your post here. Looking for a new book to read? Find these available at bit.ly/Pothbooks
************ Also, check out my THRIVEinEDU PodcastHere!
Join my show on THRIVEinEDU on Facebook. Join the group here.
Guest post by Dr. Torrey Trust and Dr. Robert Maloy
The XXV Winter Olympic Games begin on February 6 in Milano Cortina, Italy, with some 3500 athletes from 93 countries competing in 116 medal events. In March, the 14th Paralympic Games will be held with more than 600 athletes competing in six events.
To engage students and teachers in exploring sports in the context of global relationships, we developed a 2026 Winter Olympics Digital Choice Board, and we want to share it with you. Boxes on the choice board are designed to take a wide view of the games, focusing on designing new Olympic equipment, honoring past Olympic athletes, and assessing the impacts of the games on host cities and local environments, as well as assessing the political rights and freedoms of people in countries around the world. There are also activities on the choice board that feature the use of GenAI tools to support student learning. Try out the choice board and let the games and the learning begin!
Torrey Trust, Ph.D., is a Professor of Learning Technology in the College of Education at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. Her work centers on empowering educators and students to critically explore emerging technologies and make thoughtful, informed choices about their role in teaching and learning. Dr. Trust has received the University of Massachusetts Amherst Distinguished Teaching Award (2023), the College of Education Outstanding Teaching Award (2020), and the International Society for Technology in Education Making IT Happen Award (2018), which “honors outstanding educators and leaders who demonstrate extraordinary commitment, leadership, courage, and persistence in improving digital learning opportunities for students.” More recently, Dr. Trust has been a leading voice in exploring GenAI technologies in education and has been featured by several media outlets in articles and podcasts, including Educational Leadership, U.S. News & World Report, WIRED, Tech & Learning, The HILL, and EducationWeek. www.torreytrust.com
Robert W. Maloy is a senior lecturer in the College of Education at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, where he coordinates the history teacher education program and co-directs the TEAMS Tutoring Project, a community engagement/service learning initiative through which university students provide academic tutoring to culturally and linguistically diverse students in public schools throughout the Connecticut River Valley region of western Massachusetts. His research focuses on technology and educational change, teacher education, democratic teaching, and student learning. He is co-author of AI and Civic Engagement: 75+ Cross-Curricular Activities to Empower Your Students, Transforming Learning with New Technologies (4th edition); Kids Have All the Write Stuff: Revised and Updated for a Digital Age; Wiki Works: Teaching Web Research and Digital Literacy in History and Humanities Classrooms; We, the Students and Teachers: Teaching Democratically in the History and Social Studies Classroom; Ways of Writing with Young Kids: Teaching Creativity and Conventions Unconventionally; Kids Have All the Write Stuff: Inspiring Your Child to Put Pencil to Paper; The Essential Career Guide to Becoming a Middle and High School Teacher; Schools for an Information Age; andPartnerships for Improving Schools.
About Rachelle
Dr. Rachelle Dené Poth is a Spanish and STEAM: What’s Next in Emerging Technology Teacher. Rachelle is also an attorney with a Juris Doctor degree from Duquesne University School of Law and a Master’s in Instructional Technology. Rachelle received her Doctorate in Instructional Technology, with a research focus on AI and Professional Development. In addition to teaching, she is a full-time consultant and works with companies and organizations to provide PD, speaking, and consulting services. Contact Rachelle for your event!
Rachelle is an ISTE-certified educator and community leader who served as president of the ISTE Teacher Education Network. By EdTech Digest, she was named the EdTech Trendsetter of 2024, one of 30 K-12 IT Influencers to follow in 2021, and one of 150 Women Global EdTech Thought Leaders in 2022.
She is the author of ten books, including ‘What The Tech? An Educator’s Guide to AI, AR/VR, the Metaverse and More” and ‘How To Teach AI’. In addition, other books include, “In Other Words: Quotes That Push Our Thinking,” “Unconventional Ways to Thrive in EDU,” “The Future is Now: Looking Back to Move Ahead,” “Chart A New Course: A Guide to Teaching Essential Skills for Tomorrow’s World, “True Story: Lessons That One Kid Taught Us,” “Things I Wish […] Knew” and her newest “How To Teach AI” is available from ISTE or on Amazon.
Contact Rachelle to schedule sessions about Artificial Intelligence, AI and the Law, Coding, AR/VR, and more for your school or event! Submit the Contact Form.
Follow Rachelle on Bluesky, Instagram, and X at @Rdene915
**Interested in writing a guest blog for my site? Would love to share your ideas! Submit your post here. Looking for a new book to read? Find these available at bit.ly/Pothbooks
************ Also, check out my THRIVEinEDU PodcastHere!
Join my show on THRIVEinEDU on Facebook. Join the group here.
In collaboration with Delightex Edu. All opinions are my own.
Over the past 9 years, using Delightex Edu (formerly CoSpaces Edu) with my students, I have seen it continually add features that spark curiosity, boost creativity, and offer more engaging ways for students to build their knowledge. I have often said that we need to move students from consumers to creators, to innovators, and with Delightex Edu, students don’t just consume content, they create immersive worlds. Students and educators can design 3D worlds, build interactive environments, and leverage all of the options for coding and creating a more authentic and personalized product.
Delightex Edu is a highly visual, user-friendly, intuitive system that helps students develop essential skills such as collaboration, creativity, logic, problem-solving, and more that will lead to future success. These are skills that have been in demand, and they are not changing, but what is changing is the “how” students can develop these and other essential future-ready skills.
Most recently, Delightex has added AI features to its already robust platform. Artificial intelligence is not a futuristic concept. I have been speaking about augmented and virtual reality and AI for more than eight years, and these concepts are not going away. They have become part of everyday life, shaping how we work, communicate, and create.
As digital literacy evolves, students need opportunities not just to use AI, but also to understand it, question it, and use and create with it responsibly. Delightex Edu’s latest update takes what it already offers to a new level. AI enhances the creative experience, expanding what students can build while engaging them in hands-on, safe, and exciting learning opportunities.
The new AI features focus on three essential principles: smarter creation, deeper learning, and safe innovation.
AI to amplify creation and not replace student creativity
One of the most important things that I have shared with students and educators is that having the new AI features should not be thought of as a substitute for students’ own thinking and creativity. Instead, it should amplify learning while also teaching students about AI’s capabilities in a safe space, which is what matters as we help them build content skills and AI literacy.
Students are still in control and taking the lead as they create and apply their knowledge in new ways. They are still the designers, the coders, the curious learners, and the storytellers. AI is just another tool in the Delightex toolbox. They now have more opportunities to learn about prompting, how to generate images they want, and be able to develop true AI literacy alongside computational thinking skills.
AI Buddies: Bringing Worlds to Life
Whether for students or educators, Delightex Edu is so much fun to dive into and start creating with, especially with AI Buddies, which are AI-powered 3D characters that can talk, react, and express emotions through real-time animations. AI Buddies are defined by creating a short prompt and can act as guides, tutors, narrators, or characters in a story. AI Buddies make it so much fun for anyone creating with Delightex.
AI Buddies are a fun addition to any project. They respond via text and can also use expressive animations that make interactions feel more natural and believable. Students can set proximity triggers in their environment so that an AI Buddy responds automatically when someone enters a specific area of a scene. This was a game-changer because it shifted the static environment into a more responsive and immersive experience.
When I think about the possibilities and how AI buddies will amplify learning, they can help students create more engaging stories, interactive simulations, and even role-based learning. Imagine having a historical figure who can speak to students. Or a science class or a language class, with a virtual guide who can walk users through a location unique to the content. Characters in a story can respond differently depending on the choices the player makes.
These possibilities also bring some reminders. Safety, especially when it comes to AI, is critical. With Delightex Edu, teachers control student access by license, class, or each individual student. Guardrails, Content Guard, and AI History ensure that any interactions stay age-appropriate, transparent, and are reviewable by the teacher.
AI Skills: Coding and AI Literacy
When AI Buddies are added to each student’s Project, it brings their story and their world to life. With AI Skills, students can decide how the characters will act.
AI Skills enables students to design actions using visual coding and assign them to AI Buddies. Using Delightex’s CoBlocks system, AI Skills combine traditional visual logic with the use of simple prompts. Students still define conditions, test behaviors, and refine outcomes as they have been able to do, but now with AI Skills, the characters can respond in more natural ways to dialogue and intent.
When learning to code, students were programming only event-based responses, for example, “when this happens, do that.” However, now, students think about how these intelligent systems are able to interpret meaning. It can lead to great conversations in the classroom, and students or teachers can talk about questions such as:
How does a character decide what action makes sense?
What happens when prompts are unclear?
How do logic and language work together?
AI-Generated 360° Worlds Inside 3D Scenes
One of my favorite new AI features is that I can dream big and create fun prompts that generate beautiful images. Through Delightex Edu’s Skybox integration, you can generate AI-powered 360° images right inside 3D scenes. Before this feature was added, scenes were limited, but now any 3D scene can be transformed into a fully immersive 360° environment, truly expanding creative possibilities. Students can instantly generate any backdrop they can imagine for their stories, simulations, or virtual field trips. Once they create their new background, they can select from all of the options for characters, objects, and more. It boosts student engagement and promotes more experiential learning.
Why This Is Important for the Future of Learning
As I explored these recent updates, I realized they are moving us toward what digital literacy should look like in an AI-powered world.
Whether early learners, older students, or educators, everyone needs opportunities to create with AI and understand its capabilities. And, they need to be able to do so in safe environments where experimentation is encouraged, guardrails are in place, and active learning is available. Delightex Edu is a platform where AI enhances creativity, deepens understanding of new technologies, supports the acquisition of content knowledge, and prepares students for future work and learning.
Always at the forefront with great features that bring amazing learning possibilities to students, I’m looking forward to more features from Delightex. And I am excited for all students who will be able to apply their knowledge in exciting and innovative ways!
To learn more and have fun creating, visit delightex.com/edu. Explore the gallery, check out the resources, and then start your own project! Have fun learning!
About Rachelle
Dr. Rachelle Dené Poth is a Spanish and STEAM: What’s Next in Emerging Technology Teacher. Rachelle is also an attorney with a Juris Doctor degree from Duquesne University School of Law and a Master’s in Instructional Technology. Rachelle received her Doctorate in Instructional Technology, with a research focus on AI and Professional Development. In addition to teaching, she is a full-time consultant and works with companies and organizations to provide PD, speaking, and consulting services. Contact Rachelle for your event!
Rachelle is an ISTE-certified educator and community leader who served as president of the ISTE Teacher Education Network. By EdTech Digest, she was named the EdTech Trendsetter of 2024, one of 30 K-12 IT Influencers to follow in 2021, and one of 150 Women Global EdTech Thought Leaders in 2022.
She is the author of ten books, including ‘What The Tech? An Educator’s Guide to AI, AR/VR, the Metaverse and More” and ‘How To Teach AI’. In addition, other books include, “In Other Words: Quotes That Push Our Thinking,” “Unconventional Ways to Thrive in EDU,” “The Future is Now: Looking Back to Move Ahead,” “Chart A New Course: A Guide to Teaching Essential Skills for Tomorrow’s World, “True Story: Lessons That One Kid Taught Us,” “Things I Wish […] Knew” and her newest “How To Teach AI” is available from ISTE or on Amazon.
Contact Rachelle to schedule sessions about Artificial Intelligence, AI and the Law, Coding, AR/VR, and more for your school or event! Submit the Contact Form.
Follow Rachelle on Bluesky, Instagram, and X at @Rdene915
**Interested in writing a guest blog for my site? Would love to share your ideas! Submit your post here. Looking for a new book to read? Find these available at bit.ly/Pothbooks
************ Also, check out my THRIVEinEDU PodcastHere!
Join my show on THRIVEinEDU on Facebook. Join the group here.
As I reflect on 2025, it feels like a year of recalibration. I think about education, and while things were definitely moving faster, especially with AI and the changes it has brought, I feel like things are moving at a deeper level. After several years of rapid changes, disruptions, and adjustments, many educators, leaders, and systems seem to have shifted from being reactive to proactive, and, more importantly, to focusing more on reflective practices. Some questions I consider are:
What is actually working? What is overwhelming students and teachers? What does “future-ready” really mean, and is it the proper term?
In many ways, 2025 feels more like a time when education stopped trying to keep up with every new trend, took a breath, and began reclaiming its intention.
From Urgency to Intention
The past few years have required schools to operate in what I’ve heard in many conversations as a “crisis mode.” After some thought, I have seen and experienced a shift away from an overwhelming sense of urgency to accomplish everything and toward purposeful decision-making. A word that I have used a lot after reading a book by Kevin Roose called Futureproof is “discernment.” He wrote about the shift from media and digital literacy to digital discernment. I’ve seen this in my own practice as well. Educators have become more discerning about initiatives to invest in, tools to explore, and expectations to set. The question “Can we do this?” shifted to “Should we do this? And “Why?” Which then led to the “How” part.
This shift showed up in conversations around curriculum, assessment, technology use, and student well-being. Schools began reducing or being more selective rather than layering, which helped educators to adjust better to change. Leaders focused more on coherence instead of compliance. And in some conversations I had or articles I read, I noticed respectful pushback on practices that added complexity without improving learning.
I think this is why the recalibration mattered.
AI Moved From Novelty to Normal
Since artificial intelligence and all of the new tools arrived in classrooms, it was an interesting time for educators. Something novel, something cool yet scary at times I’ve been told by educators that I am training, and other times, something to be avoided at all costs. But, what I noticed this year has been a shift. A shift away from the worries about plagiarism and cheating, about the time needed to learn how to leverage AI in our work, to a focus on how to bring it into our classrooms intentionally, purposefully, responsibly. In 2025, AI in education has become more of the norm.
I have noticed a change in the reactions. Now I see more focus on:
Data privacy
Ethical use and attribution
Age-appropriate access
Skill-building over shortcut-taking. (Leaning on versus learning from)
Transparency instead of surveillance
AI has become less about “cheating” and more about helping students and others learn how to think, evaluate, and create responsibly in an AI-infused world. Educators that I have worked with in my own school, at conferences and during professional development sessions that I have provided, have been asking different questions. At first, questions focused on “How can I tell when a student has used ChatGPT?” “Why do I need to teach about AI in the elementary level, they are too young and it is too much technology?” and “How do I find the time to evaluate the tools?” and more. But now, the questions are more targeted. Some examples are “How does this tool support learning goals?” and “When does it enhance or push thinking and when does it replace it?” Questions are also asked about how to connect AI into different grade levels and content areas without it feeling like something extra. I think the key to these questions is keeping the focus on the human aspect of learning and teaching.
We need to become AI literate and help students to develop their AI literacy skills, which do not only require developing technical skills. It also involves essentially human skills such as judgment, empathy, discernment, and reflection. With so much technology, the impact on us as humans is real and brings out the importance of digital wellbeing in addition to digital citizenship.
Digital Wellness
I’ve been working on an initiative through ISTE+ASCD and Pinterest that focuses on digital wellbeing and digital citizenship, both aligned with innovation. Something that I’ve noticed in the conversations at the schools is that educators are realizing that digital citizenship alone is not enough. Conversations about constant connectivity and the cost of it have been taking place and leading to new policies and guidelines in schools.
As a result, digital wellness has emerged as a priority for all, rather than as a standalone curriculum In my work with educators, each group talked openly about:
Attention fatigue
Notification overload
Screen balance
Emotional regulation
Boundaries and agency
Cellphone bans were in place and while some saw the positives, others raised some interesting points. Rather than banning technology outright or ignoring its impact, should we instead focus on intentional use of it and guide students? Questions like “When does technology add value?” and “When should we step away?” became part of the discussions in and out of the classroom.
Focusing on the human connection
I noticed in some schools that I visited, more socialization, more connections being made between students in the classrooms. More time for colleagues to work together and with their students.
There was renewed emphasis on:
Relationships over rigid pacing
Depth over coverage
Dialogue over compliance
Reflection over reaction
Administrators that I spoke with have said they are listening more closely and trust teachers to use their professional judgment. Something else I noticed was an increase in the inclusion of student voice in conversations about learning, technology, and school culture. I have asked students for feedback for many years and value their input as it expands my understanding and helps me to better connect. In some of the schools that I have visited, common questions to students have been:
How do you learn best?
What feels supportive vs. stressful?
How does technology affect your focus and well-being?
What do you want your teachers, families, friends, to understand about your experience?
When students were invited into these conversations, the results were powerful. They wanted agency, not avoidance. They wanted guidance on balance, which could not be learned through complete bans. When students were treated as collaborators or partners in shaping their learning environments, it led to powerful learning and growing as a school community.
The Power of Reflection
I wrote about it, spoke about it, and engaged in reflection myself and with other educators. We often noted the increase in the need for reflection, especially in our field that is constantly changing.
Some areas that I considered:
What I kept doing out of habit
What I needed to let go of for sustainability
What truly mattered in my classroom
What I needed to do to make a difference
Was I involving my students in decisions
What kind of educator I wanted to be
Reflection shouldn’t be about perfection, at least not in my mind. I see it as a way to focus on continued growth, clarity, and purpose in my work.
Some things that I learned in 2025
I had many opportunities to learn and share my learning with others. I provided some keynotes and a lot of training and working with educators from around the world. When I tried to gather my thoughts about innovation, effective technology use, digital wellness, student voice and agency, and reflection, I came to some conclusions…at least as of today. But I will continue to reflect.
Innovation without intention leads to exhaustion.
Technology must serve learning, not dominate it.
Wellness is foundational to continued growth.
Students are capable of thoughtful insight when involved in the conversation.
Reflection is a powerful driver of meaningful change.
Education does not become easier with each passing year but I do find that the conversations become more transparent and honest.
As I close the year on blogs for 2025, I leave you with some questions to consider, that I have considered myself:
Looking Back
What was one moment in 2025 when teaching or learning felt especially meaningful for you? Why?
What was draining or unsustainable this year as opposed to other years?
What practice, tool, or expectation did you decide to let go of, and why?
Technology & Learning 4. Where did technology genuinely support learning this year? How? 5. Where did it lead to distraction, add extra pressure, or increase overload?
Well-being 6. When did you feel most balanced as an educator this year? What contributed to your balance? 7. What helped you to decide when something was “too much”?
You might even choose to engage in conversations with colleagues or a PLC for even more opportunities to learn and connect.
As we move forward into 2026, we must continue to design learning experiences that are human-centered, values-driven, and always reflective. If 2025 could offer advice, it might be to Slow down in order to choose well.
About Rachelle
Dr. Rachelle Dené Poth is a Spanish and STEAM: What’s Next in Emerging Technology Teacher. Rachelle is also an attorney with a Juris Doctor degree from Duquesne University School of Law and a Master’s in Instructional Technology. Rachelle received her Doctorate in Instructional Technology, with a research focus on AI and Professional Development. In addition to teaching, she is a full-time consultant and works with companies and organizations to provide PD, speaking, and consulting services. Contact Rachelle for your event!
Rachelle is an ISTE-certified educator and community leader who served as president of the ISTE Teacher Education Network. By EdTech Digest, she was named the EdTech Trendsetter of 2024, one of 30 K-12 IT Influencers to follow in 2021, and one of 150 Women Global EdTech Thought Leaders in 2022.
She is the author of ten books, including ‘What The Tech? An Educator’s Guide to AI, AR/VR, the Metaverse and More” and ‘How To Teach AI’. In addition, other books include, “In Other Words: Quotes That Push Our Thinking,” “Unconventional Ways to Thrive in EDU,” “The Future is Now: Looking Back to Move Ahead,” “Chart A New Course: A Guide to Teaching Essential Skills for Tomorrow’s World, “True Story: Lessons That One Kid Taught Us,” “Things I Wish […] Knew” and her newest “How To Teach AI” is available from ISTE or on Amazon.
Contact Rachelle to schedule sessions about Artificial Intelligence, AI and the Law, Coding, AR/VR, and more for your school or event! Submit the Contact Form.
Follow Rachelle on Bluesky, Instagram, and X at @Rdene915
**Interested in writing a guest blog for my site? Would love to share your ideas! Submit your post here. Looking for a new book to read? Find these available at bit.ly/Pothbooks
************ Also, check out my THRIVEinEDU PodcastHere!
Join my show on THRIVEinEDU on Facebook. Join the group here.
Welcome to “Students, Teachers, and, Chatbots: Learning Plans for Exploring Civic Issues with GenAI!” In this monthly series, you will find classroom-ready learning plans to use as you explore different civic engagement issues and topics with students. Each learning plan is connected to one of the ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education) Standards for Students.
Imagine you have to vote in a school, local organization, community, state, or national election about a much debated and highly controversial issue. Someone proposes that instead of engaging in lengthy and potentially bitter debates, the group just let AI decide for them. What would be your response?
The question is no longer hypothetical. There are groups and government organizations in other countries that are turning over decisions about policies to AI chatbots. There is even a term for AI decision-making called “Algocracy” or government by algorithm.
Will chatbots make better decisions than elected political leaders or citizen voters? Many people now believe so. Across people in 35+ countries and speaking seven different languages, those surveyed were 30 percent more likely to see chatbots acting in their best interest and making better policy decisions on their behalf (Tech and Social Cohesion, 2025).
Letting chatbots make public policy decisions is known as “Algocracy” or “government by algorithm” (Thompson, 2022). The appeal of this idea is not hard to understand. People in country after country express distrust of politicians and political systems while also believing in the objectivity and efficiency of computer programs. Since chatbots are already proving they can make medical decisions at rates that can exceed those of human doctors, why wouldn’t chatbots do a better job of deciding where to spend money and allocate scarce resources?
Critics of algocracy are quick to point out that chatbots are not neutral tools. They function based on the datasets on which they have been trained, and that information has been shown to have alarmingly large amounts of misinformation and deep cultural, gender, racial, ability, and language biases (learn more).
Moreover, chatbots are “black boxes,” meaning users do not know how the systems actually make decisions. While how chatbots make decisions is invisible, the actions of elected representatives are matters of public record. Online and in print, you can research how your senator, representative, town or city council member, mayor, or other elected officials voted on the issues and you can write to them to express your views, for or against, their actions.
So what role, if any, should AI play in making decisions in democratic settings? Two former Google executives have proposed “rather than replace democracy with A.I., we must instead use A.I. to reinvigorate democracy, making it more responsive, more deliberative and more worthy of public trust” (Schmidt & Sorota, 2025, para. 3). This activity explores ways that AI can promote democracy and democratic decision-making while strengthening people’s participation in government and society.
Learning Goal
Students will build their civic knowledge by exploring the real world issue of Algocracy.
ACTIVITY 1: Using GenAI to Make Decisions for a Day (or an Hour)
Pick one day, one class, or one hour, and let GenAI make all the decisions for the class about what to do.
Example Prompt: “Respond yes or no and explain your reasoning for the following question from my 7th-grade students: Should we read Hamlet today or play Roblox?”
At the end of the day, class, or hour, invite students to reflect on their initial response to the student engagement question (“If a decision needs to be made, would you rather vote on it or have an AI chatbot decide?”) and whether they would change their response based on their experience asking GenAI to make decisions for them.
Then, have students research the concept of algocracy and current examples of AI decision-making by elected officials.
Finally, invite students to write a letter to their local town or state government in favor of, or in opposition to, this concept.
ACTIVITY 2: Critical Analysis of AI Decision-Making in Government
Invite students to research and then discuss the following questions:
How could the biases embedded in data shape political decision-making from AI systems?
How might AI-generated hallucinations affect governmental decision-making?
Who might benefit from AI decision making in government or an algocracy?
Who might be harmed from AI decision-making in government or an algocracy?
How might AI decision-making shift power dynamics within government? Who gains new forms of authority, and who loses it?
If an AI system makes an unjust or harmful decision, who should be held accountable (e.g., AI system developer? government officials?)
Who is more trustworthy? A politician or an AI system? Why?
Then, based on their research and discussion,
Reflection Questions
What role do you think AI systems will play in governmental decision-making 30 years from now? What about 100 years from now?
How might AI-driven governance shape or reshape democracy?
Would you vote for an AI candidate over a human candidate? Why or why not?
Could heavy reliance on AI governance discourage civic engagement or participation? Why or why not?
AI Literacy Questions
If you were to build an AI system to make decisions for the government, what data would you use to train the system? How would you reduce hallucinations? What safeguards would you put in place? What other ethical considerations would guide your design?
If GenAI systems can process far more information than humans, does that make it a better decision-maker? Why or why not?
ISTE Knowledge Constructor Criteria Addressed
1.3.a Effective Research Strategies. Students use effective research strategies to find resources that support their learning needs, personal interests, and creative pursuits.
1.3.b Evaluate Information. Students evaluate the accuracy, validity, bias, origin, and relevance of digital content.
1.3.d Explore Real-World Issues. Students build knowledge by exploring real-world issues and gain experience in applying their learning in authentic settings.
Assesses Switzerland’s efforts to build an ethical large language model for the public good, trained on only publicly available content.
Author Bios
Torrey Trust, Ph.D. is a Professor of Learning Technology in the College of Education at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Her work centers on empowering educators and students to critically explore emerging technologies and make thoughtful, informed choices about their role in teaching and learning. Dr. Trust has received the University of Massachusetts Amherst Distinguished Teaching Award (2023), the College of Education Outstanding Teaching Award (2020), and the International Society for Technology in Education Making IT Happen Award (2018), which “honors outstanding educators and leaders who demonstrate extraordinary commitment, leadership, courage, and persistence in improving digital learning opportunities for students.” More recently, Dr. Trust has been a leading voice in exploring GenAI technologies in education and has been featured by several media outlets in articles and podcasts, including Educational Leadership, U.S. News & World Report, WIRED, Tech & Learning, The HILL, and EducationWeek. http://www.torreytrust.com
Robert W. Maloy is a senior lecturer in the College of Education at the University of Massachusetts Amherst where he coordinates the history teacher education program and co-directs the TEAMS Tutoring Project, a community engagement/service learning initiative through which university students provide academic tutoring to culturally and linguistically diverse students in public schools throughout the Connecticut River Valley region of western Massachusetts. His research focuses on technology and educational change, teacher education, democratic teaching, and student learning. He is co-author of AI and Civic Engagement: 75+ Cross-Curricular Activities to Empower Your Students, Transforming Learning with New Technologies (4th edition); Kids Have All the Write Stuff: Revised and Updated for a Digital Age; Wiki Works: Teaching Web Research and Digital Literacy in History and Humanities Classrooms; We, the Students and Teachers: Teaching Democratically in the History and Social Studies Classroom; Ways of Writing with Young Kids: Teaching Creativity and Conventions Unconventionally; Kids Have All the Write Stuff: Inspiring Your Child to Put Pencil to Paper; The Essential Career Guide to Becoming a Middle and High School Teacher; Schools for an Information Age; andPartnerships for Improving Schools.
About Rachelle
Dr. Rachelle Dené Poth is a Spanish and STEAM: What’s Next in Emerging Technology Teacher. Rachelle is also an attorney with a Juris Doctor degree from Duquesne University School of Law and a Master’s in Instructional Technology. Rachelle received her Doctorate in Instructional Technology, with a research focus on AI and Professional Development. In addition to teaching, she is a full-time consultant and works with companies and organizations to provide PD, speaking, and consulting services. Contact Rachelle for your event!
Rachelle is an ISTE-certified educator and community leader who served as president of the ISTE Teacher Education Network. By EdTech Digest, she was named the EdTech Trendsetter of 2024, one of 30 K-12 IT Influencers to follow in 2021, and one of 150 Women Global EdTech Thought Leaders in 2022.
She is the author of ten books, including ‘What The Tech? An Educator’s Guide to AI, AR/VR, the Metaverse and More” and ‘How To Teach AI’. In addition, other books include, “In Other Words: Quotes That Push Our Thinking,” “Unconventional Ways to Thrive in EDU,” “The Future is Now: Looking Back to Move Ahead,” “Chart A New Course: A Guide to Teaching Essential Skills for Tomorrow’s World, “True Story: Lessons That One Kid Taught Us,” “Things I Wish […] Knew” and her newest “How To Teach AI” is available from ISTE or on Amazon.
Contact Rachelle to schedule sessions about Artificial Intelligence, AI and the Law, Coding, Cybersecurity, STEM, AR/VR, and more for your school or speaking event! Submit the Contact Form.
Follow Rachelle on Bluesky, Instagram, Threads, and X at @Rdene915
**Interested in writing a guest blog for my site? Would love to share your ideas! Submit your post here. Looking for a new book to read? Find these available at bit.ly/Pothbooks
************ Also, check out my THRIVEinEDU PodcastHere!
Join my show on THRIVEinEDU on Facebook. Join the group here.
Learning as I go: Reflections & lessons learned 