The Case for Normalizing Accessibility Tools in Schools
Guest post by Paul Stisser,
The cornerstone of education is building pathways to success for all students. The right accessibility tools can often help, making it possible for students of all abilities to thrive. But when the same tools that provide assistance to students leave them vulnerable to stares, harassment, or bullying from classmates, they ultimately do as much harm as good. So how can we make sure students get the assistive technology they need while preventing them from feeling self-conscious? The answer is to make tools available to all students and normalize assistive technology.
In schools today, about one in seven children receive special education services. But some children never receive the proper diagnosis to qualify for the support they need. For other students, requests are tangled up in slow-moving processes. The result is there may be even more students than we realize who can benefit from assistive technology. At the same time, more classes are using digital content, especially after the pandemic ushered in a new wave of digital materials, educational apps, and tech-enabled curricula. While the move to higher degrees of digital education has led to big strides in personalization and accessibility of learning, the Office for Civil Rights is also receiving a growing number of complaints about digital accessibility in K-12 schools.
By prioritizing digital accessibility, we have the power to solve the challenges students with disabilities face and improve the learning experience for all students. It’s similar to the effect of curb cuts on sidewalks. While the initial intention of curb cuts was to help people in wheelchairs, they also benefit people with strollers, wheeled luggage, and bicycles. Similarly, when we take steps to enhance accessibility for all students, we foster a stronger sense of belonging in the classroom. Whether it involves making websites more accessible, enabling students of diverse learning styles to easily engage with content, or harnessing text-to-speech (TTS) tools to support those developing reading skills, English language learners, and auditory learners, the path to inclusivity and student success starts with normalizing accessibility. Below are just a few ideas schools and districts can adopt to introduce accessibility tools to more students.
Talk to students
Including the voices of students in conversations about tools and what they need can be very useful. Students can tell you what is working with the technology they have and what else they might need. When talking to students be sure to include diverse perspectives, with voices from students who need accommodations as well as those who don’t. The way you collect feedback can vary too, depending on the culture of your district or school. Many leaders have success with everything from student representatives on technology committees to conducting surveys and focus groups. Remember that candid, informal conversations can surface great ideas too!
Ask vendors about accessibility
When evaluating new edtech, ask vendors about accessibility. Districts and schools should lead the conversation and ensure that products were designed with accessibility as central to their design, not as an afterthought or add-in. By prioritizing accessible tools and features, you add to the voices calling on the edtech community to make inclusivity a key value.
Find tools that connect to your LMS
When students have to log out of one platform and into another to get the support they need, it creates unnecessary opportunities for distractions. That’s true for students who need accommodations as well as those who don’t. Support tools that are connected to your LMS create a seamless experience for all students, keeping them focused on what they need to do. Additionally, LMS-integrated tools reduce the risk of anyone noticing that students who need support are getting it. Familiarize yourself with the 1edtech standards for interoperability. Choose products that are vetted for interoperability or certified.
Emphasize quality
When it comes to accessibility there are often many choices that are low-cost or free. But these tools can come at a cost. For example, there’s a wide variety of voice quality and learner experiences in TTS solutions. Voices that don’t sound realistic or are simply poor quality can cause students to lose focus while learning and stop using the tool.
Paying for tools can also bring helpful features that go beyond the edtech’s core function. Some TTS tools do more than read text. They can be customized with colors and fonts, and the voice sped up or slowed down. They can mask the page and hide distracting ads to keep learners focused, highlight text as it is being read, give multiple language options, and include a speech-enabled dictionary.
When we give all students the chance to use accessibility tools we unlock new levels of classroom inclusivity. By making support tools available to all students, we reduce barriers to engaging with digital content, embrace all learning abilities and learning styles, and foster a stronger sense of belonging. So, let’s normalize accessibility tools so all students can not only succeed but soar.
Since joining ReadSpeaker in 2013, Paul Stisser has been a leader in ReadSpeaker’s TTS Education initiatives. Prior to ReadSpeaker, Paul worked at D2L and start-up Moblmedia. He also has 14 years of education and teaching experience in Rochester, NY, specializing in Special Education and At-Risk Students. Paul attended St. Bonaventure University with degrees in History and Literacy. Currently, he resides in Saint Augustine, Florida.
Blog of Rachelle Dené Poth
Looking for some PD for your school? I provide in-person and virtual training on the following topics. If you want to learn more about and explore AI and ChatGPT, contact me to schedule! Rdene915@gmail.com
Learning as I go: Reflections & lessons learned 